Who has done more harm to humanity, to national economies, to human infrastructure? bin Laden, or U.S. President Bush (younger)?
Usama bin Laden has deliberately killed thousands of humans, and destroyed private and municipal infrastructure.
He's also done serious damage to the global economy.
Some estimates indicate his attacks of 09/11/01 alone may have cost the U.S. economy a $Trillion.
But in quantifiable term, U.S. President Bush has killed 10's of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis and Afghanis.
And he may have killed 10's of thousands of additional enemy combatants.
bin Laden may have wanted to harm the U.S. culture, our laws, our rights, etc.
But it's been the Bush administration that has fiddled with our wire-tap laws, habeas corpus, and all the rest of it. Just the ordeal Bush has made of flying commercial is collectively worse than what bin Laden has done. (or is it?)
Usama bin Laden has deliberately killed thousands of humans, and destroyed private and municipal infrastructure.
He's also done serious damage to the global economy.
Some estimates indicate his attacks of 09/11/01 alone may have cost the U.S. economy a $Trillion.
But in quantifiable term, U.S. President Bush has killed 10's of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis and Afghanis.
And he may have killed 10's of thousands of additional enemy combatants.
bin Laden may have wanted to harm the U.S. culture, our laws, our rights, etc.
But it's been the Bush administration that has fiddled with our wire-tap laws, habeas corpus, and all the rest of it. Just the ordeal Bush has made of flying commercial is collectively worse than what bin Laden has done. (or is it?)
